Home
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Galleries
Register
Log in
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
rgnbtj86j Master of STF
|
Posted:
Thu 9:52, 17 Oct 2013 |
|
|
Joined: 11 Jul 2013
Posts: 9571 Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/3
Location: England
|
Case hearing, the court accepted the application of Zhang,[url=http://www.theirongatetn.com/peuterey.php]peuterey outlet[/url], commissioned by the Ministry of Justice Forensic Center Zhang cases were identified, and ultimately the expert opinion is: doctors use antibiotics to treat the use of antibiotics in line with the principles in the selection of the type of drug,
But taking into account the original Zhang suffering hypertension, and has been since the onset of diarrhea four days, more than the possibility of a potential impairment of renal function, therefore the use of gentamicin hospital before and during use, renal function should be measured
Lizi Qing Miao newspaper reporter correspondent Yang Luo Shuangjiang judges say: There is case law causation can be awarded First Instance sentenced Why so
Where is the extension of the value of its judgments
Medical certificate of death in the cause of death was stated: cerebral hemorrhage,[url=http://www.theirongatetn.com/moncler.php]moncler outlet[/url], uremia, hypertension 3.
Another plaintiff also claims moral damages solatium 40,000 yuan.
Comprehensive case, the court determines the defendant hospital should bear the consequences of the damage Zhang overall mortality 56% of the liability, conversion look, that is, in the range of 80% and then 70% of the responsibility assumed.
disability living allowance and other expenses 78,000 yuan,[url=http://www.zqlgxx.com/clgaoke_GuestBook.asp]http://www.zqlgxx.com/clgaoke_GuestBook.asp[/url], including disability living allowance of 5.12 million.
, disability living allowance and other related costs.
's condition has not only failed to reverse, but 10 years later deteriorated and died.
This Gulou District Court Civil Tribunal Huang Deqing made the Explanation.
Huang Deqing said: civil damages to cover the loss of principle.
November 10,[url=http://www2.jtng.com/thrc/boardthrc2/photoBBS.cgi]http://www2.jtng.com/thrc/boardthrc2/photoBBS.cgi[/url], the Drum Tower District Court premenstrual court found facts of the case verdicts.
After the verdicts, the defendant filed an appeal against the hospital, and thereafter by the Nanjing Intermediate People's Court prudent trial,[url=http://one-thought.org/comment-page-1/#comment-12600]http://one-thought.org/comment-page-1/#comment-12600[/url], judgment dismissed the appeal and upheld the original verdict.
Reporters learned that patients receive disability compensation, the family reassertion of compensation for death and eventually won, which is rare in the trial.
Disabling injury victim is entitled awarded due to incapacity caused by the duration of the life of loss of income, namely disability compensation.
Recently, the Drum Tower District 法院对该案 first instance verdict, plaintiff awarded 24.5 million yuan, of which 198,600 yuan compensation for death.
The evening of 9 January 2009, Zhang's condition suddenly deteriorated, his family rushed to the hospital another three, but the end result died,[url=http://www.jianfei-fangfa.net/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=29505&fromuid=7203]http://www.jianfei-fangfa.net/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=29505&fromuid=7203[/url], died the next day.
their families can be re-charged.
dosage and route of administration is no error in principle.
After processing the funeral shortly Zhang, Zhang's wife Wang Fang, Zhang Kai, another son of the original three hospitals for the treatment Zhang sued Gulou District Court,[url=http://evilcodes.tk/wiki/index.php/User:J5h3kp3bb#Courageous_man_chasing_bandits_injuring_passers-lose-a_prize]http://evilcodes.tk/wiki/index.php/User:J5h3kp3bb#Courageous_man_chasing_bandits_injuring_passers-lose-a_prize[/url], requested the court to sentence the defendant compensation for medical expenses, funeral expenses, death compensation
Their families believe that it is the fault of the hospital when Zhang's death was a result of the consequences, it is also sued Gulou District Court demanding payment of death compensation.
Huang Deqing President said: the case has an extended reference value judgment, a party subject to physical damage, after obtaining disability compensation, because the same kind of damage or illness resulting in death, as long as the difference between a causal relationship with the law,
and a total of 406,200 yuan of 80%.
The victim in obtaining disability compensation,[url=http://www.kotitle.com/mulberry_outlet.php]mulberry sale[/url], if the facts as the same crippling disease progression and death increased,[url=http://www.otsu.ed.jp/ktt-e/bbs/bbs.cgi/bbs.cgi%20Resul%3C/a%3E%20-%20(21/06/2556%2003%3A19%3A32)%20%3Cbr/%3EIP%3A%2046.105.113.181%3C/td%3E%20%20%20%20%3C/tr%3E%3C/bbs.cgi]http://www.otsu.ed.jp/ktt-e/bbs/bbs.cgi/bbs.cgi%20Resul%3C/a%3E%20-%20(21/06/2556%2003%3A19%3A32)%20%3Cbr/%3EIP%3A%2046.105.113.181%3C/td%3E%20%20%20%20%3C/tr%3E%3C/bbs.cgi[/url],[url=http://www.kordil.net/packages/]woolrich[/url], there existed legal causation,[url=http://www.mydaylilies.com/files/scarpe-hogan-outlet/]scarpe hogan[/url], compensation for rights holders entitled to compensation for death law.
situation, but the medical side negligent in this regard, it should be determined by the treating hospital surviving in this inadequacy.
April 2001, Zhang to the medical side failed to fulfill its due diligence, duty of care, breach of technical operation and the principle of drug use, leading to their own hurt grounds, to the Drum Tower District Court proceedings, the defendant hospital claim compensation for medical expenses
Zhang was discharged, the applicant Medical Malpractice, but after two setbacks, district and municipal levels, organizations have identified Zhang Medical Malpractice cases do not belong to medical malpractice.
Forensic results came out, Zhang and apply for authority to do a disability rating appraisal, conclusions identified Zhang renal injury constitutes four disability.
The court held that the referee had become effective instruments confirm the results show that the defendant hospital deal with Zhang consequences of chronic renal failure and other damage 80% of the liability.
According to the expert opinion, December 15, 2003, the court based on the facts found, and with reference to the above conclusions on the case of first instance verdict, the verdict for the defendant hospital Zhang bear 80% of the consequences of the damage liability, compensation for medical expenses,[url=http://www.insurecn.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=674718]http://www.insurecn.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=674718[/url], injury
Treatment of diarrhea caused by renal failure, 8 December 1998,[url=http://www.kuronowish.com/~kinki_railmodel/cgi-bin/bbs/joyful.cgi]http://www.kuronowish.com/~kinki_railmodel/cgi-bin/bbs/joyful.cgi[/url], 57-year-old Zhang in Nanjing due to diarrhea in a tertiary level hospital.
After the death of family members of patients re-claim compensation until March 2008, Zhang did not re-hospitalization, it has not been to the defendant hospital outpatient monitoring of renal function, patient doctor to "chronic renal failure" given symptomatic treatment.
Family sued on the grounds that Zhang's death and the defendant's pre-fault behavior of a causal relationship.
According to the court finds that the data calculated according to the law, according to Civil Law and relevant judicial interpretations, judgments Zhang defendant hospital compensation totaling 245,300 yuan for the loss of family members, including death compensation is 19.86 million.
Continue treatment fees, according to the standard 1,600 yuan per month by Zhang with monthly medical bill to the defendant hospital reimbursement.
During treatment, the hospital according to Zhang's condition, the use of gentamicin injection, surprise turned into trouble, resulting in renal failure Zhang, insurance lost their lives.
After the verdicts against the defendant hospital and filed an appeal, the present case is entering the second instance (Paper party is a pseudonym).
The post has been approved 0 times |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
fora.pl - załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
|
|